Gestão do turismo e da biodiversidade em áreas protegidas:
uma revisão sistemática internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v15i1.2682Palavras-chave:
Áreas protegidas , visitação, natureza , monitoramentoResumo
As áreas protegidas são amplamente reconhecidas como uma das principais estratégias para a conservação de espécies e ecossistemas e por serem locais privilegiados para o turismo e a recreação na natureza. No entanto, se a relação entre o turismo e a conservação não for adequadamente monitorada e gerenciada, tanto os valores do turismo quanto os da biodiversidade podem ser perdidos. Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo levantar informações disponíveis sobre a gestão do turismo sustentável e da conservação da biodiversidade em áreas protegidas, além de buscar oportunidades de pesquisa. Adicionalmente, procuramos na literatura selecionada evidências de que o turismo contribui para a conservação da natureza e de que o monitoramento da biodiversidade é realizado rotineiramente nas áreas protegidas. Utilizando o protocolo PRISMA como orientação, a partir de 73 registros recuperados do Portal de Periódicos da Capes, 27 artigos científicos revisados por pares em inglês foram selecionados para a análise. Os resultados mostraram que, apesar de 52 % dos artigos analisados apresentarem uma visão positiva da relação do turismo com a conservação da natureza, apenas 33% forneceram evidências. Nenhum dos artigos utilizou ou mencionou dados de monitoramento das áreas protegidas em seus estudos. Entre as oportunidades de pesquisa identificadas, destacamos a ciência cidadã como uma possibilidade para viabilizar o monitoramento tanto da biodiversidade quanto dos impactos ecológicos do turismo nas áreas protegidas. O estudo indica limitações na gestão das áreas protegidas e aponta estratégias para assegurar que o turismo nessas áreas seja realmente sustentável.
Downloads
Referências
1.Wilson EO. The Diversity of Life.1992.
2.Myers N. The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future: Norton; 1992. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3608-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3608-4
3.Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997; 387(6630):253-60. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
4.Soule ME. Conservation: Tactics for a Constant Crisis. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1991; 253(5021):744-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.744
5.Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. SCIENCE. 2001; 291(5501):125-8. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.125
6.Butchart SHM, Scharlemann JPW, Evans MI, Quader S, Aricò S, Arinaitwe J, et al. Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7(3). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032529
7.Eagles PFJ, McCool SF. Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas. Planning and Management. UK, USA: CABI Publishing; 2002. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995892.0000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995892.0000
8.Cunha A, Rodrigues C, Sancho-Pivoto A, Romagosa F. The connection with nature in Brazilian urban parks and its contribution to the wellness of the population and to child development. Sociedade & Natureza. 2022; 34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v34-2022-65411x DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v34-2022-65411x
9.Bernard E, Penna LAO, Araujo E. Downgrading, Downsizing, Degazettement, and Reclassification of Protected Areas in Brazil. Conservation biology. 2014; 28 (4): 939-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12298
10.Job H, Becken S, Lane B. Protected Areas in a neoliberal world and the role of tourism in supporting conservation and sustainable development: an assessment of strategic planning, zoning, impact monitoring, and tourism management at natural World Heritage Sites. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2017; 25 (12):1697-718. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1377432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1377432
11.Buckley R. Conservation Tourism: CAB International; 2010. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936655.0000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936655.0000
12.Fennell DA. Ecotourism. Fourth ed. London: Routledge; 2014. 336 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203382110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203382110
13.Budowski G. Tourism and Environmental Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence, or Symbiosis? Environmental Conservation. 1976; 3 (1): 27-31. Doi: Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900017707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900017707
14.Hadwen WL, Hill W, Pickering CM. Icons under threat: Why monitoring visitors and their ecological impacts in protected areas matters. Ecological management & restoration. 2007; 8 (3):177-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00364.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00364.x
15.Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam). 2004; 19 (6): 305-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018
16.Moore SA, Hockings M. Australian protected areas and adaptive management: contributions by visitor planning frameworks and management effectiveness assessments. Australasian journal of environmental management. 2013; 20 (4): 270-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2013.833487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2013.833487
17.Redford K. The Empty Forest. Bioscience. 1992;42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1311860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1311860
18.Benítez-López A, Santini L, Schipper AM, Busana M, Huijbregts MAJ. Intact but empty forests? Patterns of hunting-induced mammal defaunation in the tropics. PLoS biology. 2019;17 (5): e3000247-e. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000247
19.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Online). 2021; 372: n71-n. . Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
20.Pickering CM. Ten Factors that Affect the Severity of Environmental Impacts of Visitors in Protected Areas. Ambio. 2010; 39(1):70-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-009-0007-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-009-0007-6
21.Leung Y-F. Recreation ecology research in East Asia's protected areas: Redefining impacts? Journal for nature conservation. 2012; 20 (6): 349-56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.07.005
22.Marion JL. A Review and Synthesis of Recreation Ecology Research Supporting Carrying Capacity and Visitor Use Management Decisionmaking. Journal of forestry. 2016; 114 (3): 339-51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-062
23.Marion JL, Leung Y-F, Eagleston H, Burroughs K. A Review and Synthesis of Recreation Ecology Research Findings on Visitor Impacts to Wilderness and Protected Natural Areas. Journal of forestry. 2016; 114 (3): 352-62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-498
24.Canteiro M, Córdova-Tapia F, Brazeiro A. Tourism impact assessment: A tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of touristic activities in Natural Protected Areas. Tourism management perspectives. 2018; 28:220-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.09.007
25.Ouboter DA, Kadosoe VS, Ouboter PE. Impact of ecotourism on abundance, diversity and activity patterns of medium-large terrestrial mammals at Brownsberg Nature Park, Suriname. PloS one. 2021; 16 (6): e0250390-e. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250390
26.Cunha AA. Negative effects of tourism in a Brazilian Atlantic forest National Park. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2010;18 (4): 291-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.001
27.Nepal SK. Linking parks and people: Nepal's experience in resolving conflicts in parks and protected areas. International journal of sustainable development and world ecology. 2002; 9 (1):75-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500209470104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500209470104
28.Campbell G, Kuehl H, Diarrassouba A, N'Goran PK, Boesch C. Long-term research sites as refugia for threatened and over-harvested species. Biology letters (2005). 2011;7 (5):723-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0155
29.Leitis E. The role of ecotourism in the reduction of anthropogenic load on Natura 2000 territories throughout Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies. 2011; 7 (1): 79-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-011-0031-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-011-0031-1
30.Laurance WF. Does research help to safeguard protected areas? Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam). 2013; 28(5): 261-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.017
31.Tranquilli S, Abedi-Lartey M, Abernethy K, Amsini F, Asamoah A, Balangtaa C, et al. Protected Areas in Tropical Africa: Assessing Threats and Conservation Activities. PloS one. 2014; 9(12): e114154-e. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114154
32.Weaver DB, Lawton LJ. A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tourism management (1982). 2017; 60:140-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.018
33.Eshoo PF, Johnson A, Duangdala S, Hansel T. Design, monitoring and evaluation of a direct payments approach for an ecotourism strategy to reduce illegal hunting and trade of wildlife in Lao PDR. PloS one. 2018;13 (2): e0186133-e. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186133
34.Eagles PFJ. Governance of recreation and tourism partnerships in parks and protected areas. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2009; 17 (2): 231-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495725
35.Dinica V. Tourism concessions in National Parks: neo-liberal governance experiments for a Conservation Economy in New Zealand. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2017; 25 (12): 1811-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1115512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1115512
36.Oleśniewicz P, Pytel S, Markiewicz-Patkowska J, Szromek AR, Jandová S. A Model of the Sustainable Management of the Natural Environment in National Parks—A Case Study of National Parks in Poland. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (7): 2704. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072704
37.Aydin IZ, Öztürk A. Identifying, Monitoring, and Evaluating Sustainable Ecotourism Management Criteria and Indicators for Protected Areas in Türkiye: The Case of Camili Biosphere Reserve. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland). 2023; 15 (4): 2933. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042933
38.Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A. Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and conservation. 2005; 14 (11): 2507-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0
39.Buckley R, Robinson J, Carmody J, King N. Monitoring for management of conservation and recreation in Australian protected areas. Biodiversity and conservation. 2008; 17 (14): 3589-606. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9448-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9448-7
40.Catibog-Sinha C. Visitor Impact and Biodiversity: A Monitoring Framework for Protected Areas in Southern Highlands, New South Wales, Australia. Asia Pacific journal of tourism research. 2008; 13 (3): 245-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660802280364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660802280364
41.Perera-Valderrama S, Cerdeira-Estrada S, Martell-Dubois R, Rosique-de la Cruz L, Caballero-Aragón H, Valdez-Chavarin J, et al. A New Long-Term Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Program for the Knowledge and Management in Marine Protected Areas of the Mexican Caribbean. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland). 2020; 12 (18): 7814. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187814
42.Ortega-Álvarez R, Calderón-Parra R. Linking biological monitoring and wildlife ecotourism: a call for development of comprehensive community-based projects in search of sustainability. Environment, development and sustainability. 2021; 23 (3): 4149-61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00761-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00761-7
43.Boakes Z, Hall AE, Ampou EE, Jones GCA, Suryaputra IGNA, Mahyuni LP, et al. Coral reef conservation in Bali in light of international best practice, a literature review. Journal for nature conservation. 2022;67: 126190. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126190
44.Jurkus E, Povilanskas R, Taminskas J. Current Trends and Issues in Research on Biodiversity Conservation and Tourism Sustainability. Sustainability. 2022; 14 (6): 3342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063342
45.Cunha A, Costa C. Nature Tourism Research in Brazil: a preliminary scientometric approach of the last 20 years. In: Cunha A; Magro-Lindenkamp T; McCool S. Tourism and protected areas in Brazil: Challenges and perspectives. Nova York: Nova Science Publishers, 2018. 330 p.
46.Buckley R. Parks and Tourism. PLoS biology. 2009; 7 (6): e1000143-e. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000143
47. Junior, RO, Simonetti, SR, Cohn-Haft M. Observação de aves nas áreas protegidas do Amazonas. Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur). 2022; 15 (3): 487-510. Doi: https://doi.org/10.34024/rbecotur.2022.v15.13434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34024/rbecotur.2022.v15.13434
48. Cronemberger C, Ribeiro KT, Klaczko RA, De Andrade DFC, Marini-Filho OJ, Masuda LSM et al. Social Participation in the Brazilian National Biodiversity Monitoring Program Leads to Multiple Socioenvironmental Outcomes. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8. 2023; (1): 32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.582
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais de seus artigos sem restrições, concedendo ao editor direitos de publicação não exclusivos.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.
